Legal Opinion

Walloch v. Heiden

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 13, 1930PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Butler, J.,

(after stating' the facts). The appellant complains, first, of the giving of instruction No. 4, as follows: “The court instructs the jury that if you find from the evidence that neither the plaintiff nor defendant was guilty of negligence, as defined in other instructions, but that the injury was the result of accident, then your verdict will be for the defendant. ’ ’

Appellant contends that this instruction presented a question not within the issues raised by the pleadings, and that there was no evidence upon which the instruction might be based, and that it was therefore abstract,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Hot Springs Land & Imp. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Fort Smith & Western Railway Co. v. MessekSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  3. LaGrand v. Arkansas Oak Flooring Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1922

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Perkins v. ByrnesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  2. Hagger, Admx. v. Wortz Biscuit CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
  3. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. BishopSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  4. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. BurnsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  5. Day v. Trion Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1937

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API