Legal Opinion
Bolden v. Callahan
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided September 28, 2020No. 4:19-cv-00802Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION CHERYL BOLDEN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated PLAINTIFF v. Case No. 4:19-cv-00802-KGB SHARON CALLAHAN DEFENDANT ORDER Plaintiff Cheryl Bolden brings this action against defendant Sharon Callahan (Dkt. No. 1). Ms. Bolden alleges that Ms. Callahan failed to pay her and other similarly situated commission- based cosmetologists lawful minimum wages and overtime wages in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 216(b), et seq., and the Arkansas Minimum Wage Act…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hipp v. Liberty National Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- Grayson v. K Mart Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- Thiessen v. General Electric Capital Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Resendiz-Ramirez v. P & H FORESTRY, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2007
- Littlefield v. Dealer Warranty Services, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.