Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Everhart

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 14, 1914No. Appeal, No. 23PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal, No. 23, March T., 1914, by defendants, from judgment of Q. S. Perry Co., Aug. Sessions, 1913, on verdict of guilty in case of Commonwealth v. J. K. Everhart et al. Indictment for forcible entry and detainer. At the trial the jury returned a verdict of guilty. On a rule for a new trial and motion in arrest of judgment Seibert, P. J., filed the following opinion: The bill of indictment preferred in this case contains two counts.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 23, March T., 1914, by defendants, from judgment of Q. S. Perry Co., Aug. Sessions, 1913, on verdict of guilty in case of Commonwealth v. J. K. Everhart et al. Indictment for forcible entry and detainer. At the trial the jury returned a verdict of guilty. On a rule for a new trial and motion in arrest of judgment Seibert, P. J., filed the following opinion: The bill of indictment preferred in this case contains two counts. The first count charges the offenses of forcible entry and detainer, avers the evicted prosecutor, John W. Yohn, was in peaceable possession of a certain…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The judgments against the several defendants are affirmed for the reasons given by the learned president judge of the court of quarter sessions in his opinion overruling the defendants’ motion in arrest of judgment and for new trial.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LeibowitzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Commonwealth v. TilliaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. Commonwealth v. BauerErie County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API