United States v. Douglas S. Dawson
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1DissentBartels, Senior District Judge
With all due respect, I dissent, not because the sentence is excessively harsh, but because the district court failed to exercise its discretion in the imposition of the sentence. I agree with the majority’s statement of the general proposition of law that:
We have no power to change or reduce sentences imposed within the requisite legislative limits on the ground that the sentence is too severe, Townsend v. Burke, 334 U.S. 736 [68 S.Ct. 1252, 92 L.Ed. 1690] (1948), unless the trial court failed to exercise any discretion at all in imposing sentence. United States v. Main, 598 F.2d 1086, 1094…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Townsend v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Roberts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Dorszynski v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Leroy WileyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
- United States v. Eugene HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.