Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Douglas S. Dawson

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 3, 1981No. 80-1690Published

1DissentBartels, Senior District Judge

With all due respect, I dissent, not because the sentence is excessively harsh, but because the district court failed to exercise its discretion in the imposition of the sentence. I agree with the majority’s statement of the general proposition of law that:

We have no power to change or reduce sentences imposed within the requisite legislative limits on the ground that the sentence is too severe, Townsend v. Burke, 334 U.S. 736 [68 S.Ct. 1252, 92 L.Ed. 1690] (1948), unless the trial court failed to exercise any discretion at all in imposing sentence. United States v. Main, 598 F.2d 1086, 1094…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Townsend v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Roberts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Dorszynski v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. United States v. Leroy WileyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
  5. United States v. Eugene HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API