Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Persse

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1858PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Motion by defendants to compel the plaintiff to elect between two proceedings, and to proceed in one only.

1Opinion of the Court

Clerke, Justice.

In one of these actions, the plaintiff recovered judgment against the defendants ; and after the return of an execution unsatisfied, issued upon the judgment, he commenced supplementary proceedings about the 2d of December, 1857, pursuant to section 292 of the Code. On the 11th of March, 1858, he commenced an action in the nature of a creditor’s bill, to set aside an assignment made by the defendants Persse, Brooks and Megie, to the defendant Forrest. This is a motion to compel the plaintiff to elect between these two proceedings, and to proceed in one only.

*418The action allowed,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hayner v. FowlerNew York Supreme Court · 1853
  2. Seymour v. WilsonNew York Supreme Court · 1853

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Graham v. Lacrosse & Milwaukee Rail RoadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Hart v. AlbrightThe Superior Court of New York City · 1892
  3. Dollard v. TaylorThe Superior Court of New York City · 1871

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API