Porter v. . Case
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.
Tbe contention of plaintiff E. S. Porter is that Ealpb Long, who was trading under tbe name of Chero-Cola Bottling Company, made a eontract with S. E. Case to erect a building on tbe land, tbe deed to which was in Long’s trade name, “Chero-Cola Bottling Company,” and secured tbe plaintiff E. S. Porter to put in tbe building tbe plumbing fixtures. This was a separate and distinct contract. When tbe work was completed, Porter, at tbe request of Long,. furnished him an itemized statement of tbe labor and materials furnished for tbe plumbing fixtures. This was furnished prior to tbe time Long…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Morganton Manufacturing & Trading Co. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Burr v. . MaultsbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
- Bruce v. Carolina Queen Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Nicholson v. . NicholsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
3Cited by2 opinions
- Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. BasnightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Saunders v. WoodhouseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956