Rush Creek Oil & Gas Co. v. King
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Garfield • County; J. O. Robberts, Judge. Action by William King and J. 'S. Slike, partners, doing business under the firm name and style of King & Slike, against the Rush Creek Oil & Gas Company, a corporation, and others, intervention by Medora Gibbs. Erom a judgment for plaintiffs against defendants and intervener, defendant Rush Creek Oil & Gas Company and intervener bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtNicholson, J.
This action was instituted in the district court of Garfield county by the defendants in error, King & Slike, to whom we will hereafter refer as plaintiffs, against the Rush Creek Oil & Gas Company, hereinafter referred to as the company, and the First National Bank of Enid, to recover from the company the sum of $3,-136, alleged to be due plaintiffs for drilling a certain oil well and for certain delay in prosecuting the work caused by the negligence of the company, under a contract in writing between the plaintiffs and the company, and to restrain the First National Bank of Enid from…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Weer v. GandIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
- In re Estate of DeanerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Fike v. OttNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
- Pain v. ParsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
- Cornman's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.