Legal Opinion

Chicago Trust & Savings Bank v. Landfield

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 6, 1898PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Assumpsit, on promissory notes. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Edward P. Dunne, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Adams

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered in favor of appellees and against appellant. The appellant sued appellees in assumpsit. The declaration contained special counts on six promissory notes made by the appellees and the common counts. The notes were all of date October 29, 1890, and payable to the order of O. F. Malcolm and executed by appellees. Five of them are for $13 each, and payable, respectively, in one, two, three, four and five months after date, and one of them is for $278, and payable six months after date. They…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wadhams v. SwanIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Belden v. ChurchAppellate Court of Illinois · 1887
  3. Topper v. SnowIllinois Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Benson v. B. H. Morgan & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1888
  5. West Chicago Street Railroad v. SullivanIllinois Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StottsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1951
  2. Taft v. MyerscoughAppellate Court of Illinois · 1900
  3. Ewen v. TempletonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1909
  4. Stanton v. StrongAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API