Legal Opinion · Dissent

Britton v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 21, 1979No. 56680Published

1DissentClinton, Judge

Because the majority opinion creates a situation that permits Fourth Amendment rights of one citizen to be cancelled by offending conduct of another, I must dissent and protest against stripping a citizen of one of the few remaining vestiges of reasonable expectation of personal privacy while riding with another in a motor vehicle.

I take it from what is stated, as well as what is implied, by the majority opinion that a passenger who may very well be intoxicated is nevertheless not intoxicated “to the degree that he may endanger himself or another” so long as the driver operates the motor…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  2. Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
  3. Parker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API