Legal Opinion
Cruce v. State
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided April 15, 1924PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.
The plaintiff in error, Jack Cruce, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, was convicted of tbe murder of Buck Edenfield. Upon writ of error the judg*408ment was reversed on rehearing because of an erroneous definition of murder contained in the trial court’s charge to the jury. See Cruce v. State, 84 Fla. 191, 93 South. Rep. 134.
Upon a second trial the defendant was convicted of murder in the second degree. The first assignment of error rests upon the order of the .court denying the defendant’s motion, when he was put upon trial the second time, for leave to file a plea in abatement. The…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lester v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1896
- Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1869
- Colson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1906
- Barnhill v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
- Clemmons v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1901
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Raleigh Porter v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- Deeb v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
- Criminal Injuries Compensation Board v. RemsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Ezzell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
- State Ex Rel. Anderson v. Bd. of Ed. of Mingo Cty.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.