Legal Opinion

State v. Bruder

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 2004No. NonePublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KONENKAMP, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Defendant was charged with aggravated assault against a sixteen year old boy stemming from an altercation with two boys at his home. In his trial, defendant testified that one of the boys shoved him. In response, he shoved back. According to defendant, the second boy then attempted to strike him. Defendant testified that he blocked the blow and struck the boy a single time. The boy was severely injured. Despite defendant’s testimony and request for jury instructions on self-defense, the trial court ruled that defendant failed to present sufficient evidence to support…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. HuberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. EngesserSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  3. United States of America, Ex Rel. Ted Means v. Herman Solem, Warden, South Dakota State Penitentiary, Sioux Falls, South DakotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  4. State v. BogenreifSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. DeLaRosaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. CarterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. OwenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. RandleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State v. CarterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. MartinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API