Legal Opinion

Merck, Sharp & Dohme Intl. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided January 19, 1996No. Court No. 89-01-00034PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Goldberg, Judge:

This matter is before the Court following trial de novo. In this action, Merck, Sharp & Dohme International (“Merck”) claims that the United States Customs Service (“Customs”) improperly appraised Indocin SR (“Indocin”), a drug which Merck imported from an affiliated corporation in Holland. More specifically, Merck claims that Customs improperly appraised the value of an assist, indometha-cin, which Merck produced and provided free of charge to its Holland affiliate. The Court exercises its jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1581(a) (1988), and upon review ofthe…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Andy Mohan Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
  2. Andy Mohan, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975
  3. Aurea Jewelry Creations, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
  4. Aurea Jewelry Creations, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  5. Coats & Clark, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Target Stores, Div. of Target Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
  2. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  3. VWP of America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
  4. VWP of America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
  5. Peerless Clothing International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API