Merck, Sharp & Dohme Intl. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Goldberg, Judge:
This matter is before the Court following trial de novo. In this action, Merck, Sharp & Dohme International (“Merck”) claims that the United States Customs Service (“Customs”) improperly appraised Indocin SR (“Indocin”), a drug which Merck imported from an affiliated corporation in Holland. More specifically, Merck claims that Customs improperly appraised the value of an assist, indometha-cin, which Merck produced and provided free of charge to its Holland affiliate. The Court exercises its jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1581(a) (1988), and upon review ofthe…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Andy Mohan Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
- Andy Mohan, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975
- Aurea Jewelry Creations, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
- Aurea Jewelry Creations, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Coats & Clark, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Target Stores, Div. of Target Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
- Samsung Electronics America, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- VWP of America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
- VWP of America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
- Peerless Clothing International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009