Legal Opinion
Sturdevant v. Deer
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided November 13, 1975No. 75-C-381PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION and ORDER
MYRON L. GORDON, District Judge.
Two of the plaintiffs in this action, Michael E. Sturdevant and Theresa Jacobs, have filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis; in addition, the plaintiffs Sturdevant, Jacobs and Vivian D. Sackatoek have moved to proceed in forma pauperis “for taking and transcribing oral depositions.” I hold that the first motion should be granted and that the second motion should be denied.
In the plaintiffs’ first motion, framed in the language of 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (1970), plaintiffs submit that they are indigent and unable to pay their portion of the costs…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Adkins v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Paul X. Duhart v. Norman A. Carlson, Director of Prisons, John N. Mitchell, as Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- Ebenhart v. PowerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
3Cited by19 opinions
- Tabron v. GraceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Tabron v. GraceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Temple v. EllerthorpeDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1984
- Haymes v. SmithDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1976
- Carter v. Telectron, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1976
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.