Legal Opinion

Williams v. Cass

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 24, 1963No. 8199PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STONE, Judge.

For materials alleged to have been furnished for erection of a dwelling house, plaintiffs, Archie Williams and Foil Watkins doing business as Louisburg Farm Supply, sought a personal judgment for $3,292.72 with interest against defendants, Norman Cass and Betty E. Cass, husband and wife, and a lien therefor upon their 320-acre tract on which the dwelling house was situate. Defendants’ motion for a directed verdict at the close of the evidence having been overruled, the jury returned a general verdict for defendants upon which judgment was entered. Thereafter, plaintiffs’ motion…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Knorp v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  2. Castorina v. HerrmannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  3. Burr v. SinghSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  4. Rose v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  5. Houfburg v. Kansas City Stock Yards Co. of MaineSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Kreutz v. WolffMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Service Construction Company v. NicholsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  3. Rolla Lumber Company v. EvansMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. McCardie & Akers Const. Co., Inc. v. BonneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Crown Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1967

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API