People v. Hopkins

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant’s claim that he was denied his constitutional and statutory right to a particular jury chosen according to law, in whose selection he had a voice (People v Page, 72 NY2d 69, 73) is not preserved for our review because defendant failed to object to the juror’s dismissal at a time when the trial court could correct the claimed error. (CPL 470.05 [2].) Furthermore, the suppression court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant’s request for an adjournment (see, People v Singleton, 41 NY2d…