Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Martignetti

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 11, 1978PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHennessey, C.J.

On February 20, 1975, fourteen taxpayers brought an action pursuant to G. L. c. 138, § 60, and G. L. c. 139, § 16A, 1 seeking to abate the use of a building on the ground that it was being used unlawfully as a liquor nuisance. Their claim of unlawful use was based on G. L. c. 138, § 15, commonly known as the “multiple ownership law,” which provides, in substance, that no person or combination of persons, directly or indirectly, shall be granted more than three liquor licenses for the sale of alcoholic beverages to be consumed away from the premises.

The named defendants include various…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Demoulas v. Demoulas Super Markets, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  2. Klein v. CatalanoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  3. Athol Daily News v. Board of Review of the Division of Employment & TrainingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  4. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Texas Alcoholic Beverage CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
  5. Blue Hills Cemetery, Inc. v. Board of Registration in Embalming & Funeral DirectingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API