Legal Opinion
Brown v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 2, 1986No. B017356PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WOODS, P. J.
The issue in this mandate proceeding is whether a civil defendant may waive his right to assert the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination by failing to raise it as an objection to interrogatories within the 30-day period prescribed by section 2030 of the Code of Civil Procedure. As this opinion reflects, we have concluded that defendants waived their privilege.
Petitioner Dustin Brown (plaintiff) is suing real parties in interest William Boorstin, Henry Steven Boorstin, Henry Boorstin, Sr., and Donna Boorstin (defendants) for assault and battery and for…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Sarah Helen Williams Dollar v. Long Mfg., N. C., Inc., and Third-Party v. Nichols Tractor Company, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Coy v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Stevens v. MarksSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Deyo v. KilbourneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Blue Ridge Insurance Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Siry Investment v. FarkhondehpourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- Siry Investment v. FarkhondehpourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020