People v. Cotton
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Having failed to move to withdraw his plea of guilty or to vacate the judgment of conviction, defendant failed to preserve for our review his challenge to the factual sufficiency of the plea allocution (see, People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665; People v Root, 267 AD2d 1103). “In any event, where, as here, defendant pleads guilty to a crime less than that charged in the [accusatory instrument], a factual colloquy is not required” (People v Harris, 233 AD2d 959, Iv denied 89 NY2d 1094; see, People v Moore, 71 NY2d 1002, 1006; People v Gray, 190 AD2d 918,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. MooreNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. HarrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. GrayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. GrantierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000