Legal Opinion

Clements v. Coppin

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 3, 1932No. 6703PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAWTELLE, Circuit Judge.

This was a suit by the trustee in bankruptcy of the Flintex Corporation to recovér the proceeds of an insurance poliey issued on the life of one Ralph L. Clements, deceased husband of appellant, and at one time an officer of' the bankrupt corporation. At the time the policy was issued, the Flintex Corporation was named as the beneficiary therein; but at the time of the death of Clements his estate had been substituted as'beneficiary. Tbe change of beneficiary was found by tbe trial court to have been fraudulently effected; as alleged by tbe trustee. Tbe decree award-,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Burlingham v. CrouseSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. United States v. United Shoe Machinery Co. of New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Gila Water Co. v. International Finance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
  4. Matthew v. CoppinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
  5. Coats v. BartonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Dollar S. S. Lines, Inc. v. MerzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
  2. Mutual Trust Life Insurance Company v. WemyssDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1970
  3. Bourjois, Inc. v. Park Drug Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
  4. Bolander v. GodsilCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
  5. In Re BeachleyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1937

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API