Legal Opinion

Mullikin v. Latchem

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1844PublishedCited by 4 opinions

ERROR to the Fayette Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

— This was an action of covenant by Latchem, assignee of Cummins, Wright, and Cole, against the plaintiffs in error on an instrument of writing under seal for the payment of 106 dollars in current bank paper. The pleas were, 1. Failure of consideration; 2. That the writing obligatory in the declaration mentioned, was executed by defendants in part consideration of a certain deed made by Cummins, Wright, and Cole, by which they granted, sold, and conveyed to the defendants their heirs, &c., the exclusive right of making, using, and vending to others to be used within the counties of Jay, &c.,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wynn v. HidayIndiana Supreme Court · 1828
  2. Howard v. CadwaladerIndiana Supreme Court · 1839
  3. Higgins v. StrongIndiana Supreme Court · 1836

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Marston v. . SwettNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1874
  3. Love v. OldhamIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  4. McKernan v. HiteIndiana Supreme Court · 1855

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API