Schiller v. Blyth & Fargo Co.
Wyoming Supreme Court
Error to the District Court, Uinta County, Hon. David H. Craig, Judge. The action was brought by S. Schiller against the Blyth & Fargo Company, a corporation, to recover a sum alleged to be due upon the sale of merchandise. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff instituted proceedings in error. The material facts are stated in the opinion. The evidence that plaintiff complied with his contract stands uncontradicted, and he was entitled to a judgment for the amount claimed.
Read the full summary
Error to the District Court, Uinta County, Hon. David H. Craig, Judge. The action was brought by S. Schiller against the Blyth & Fargo Company, a corporation, to recover a sum alleged to be due upon the sale of merchandise. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff instituted proceedings in error. The material facts are stated in the opinion. The evidence that plaintiff complied with his contract stands uncontradicted, and he was entitled to a judgment for the amount claimed. The goods were delivered to a carrier selected by the purchaser, and, though some may have been slightly damaged in…
1Opinion of the Court
Scott, Justice.
Plaintiff in error brought this action in the District Court of Uinta County against defendant in error to recover the purchase price of certain goods and merchandise alleged to have been sold to the defendant at the latter's request. The case was tried without the intervention of a jury and the court found generally and entered judgment for the defendant. The plaintiff brings the case here on error. It is admitted in the pleadings that defendant is and was a corporation doing business at Evanston, Uinta County, Wyoming. It is alleged in the petition “that on or about September…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pope v. AllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Pierson v. . CrooksNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- More v. BonnetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Allard v. . GreasertNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Buckeye Buggy Co. v. Montana Stables, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Radalj v. Union Savings & Loan Ass'nWyoming Supreme Court · 1943
- Mette & Kanne Distilling Co. v. LowreyMontana Supreme Court · 1909
- Storz Brewing Co. v. BrownNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
- Mason v. MadsonMontana Supreme Court · 1931
- Rivers Bros. v. PutneyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.