Legal Opinion
Chambers Medical Technologies of South Carolina, Inc. v. Jarrett
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided January 19, 1994No. Civ. A. 2:90-1360-8PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BLATT, Senior District Judge.
FINDINGS OF FACT/BACKGROUND
The plaintiff, Chambers Medical Technologies, challenges the constitutionality of several provisions of both the South Carolina Infectious Waste Management Act, S.C.Code Ann. §§ 44-93-10 et seq. (“the Act”) and the regulations promulgated thereunder by the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (“DHEC”), Reg. 61-105. The original plaintiff in this case was Southland Exchange Joint Venture which owned a facility that incinerated medical, municipal solid and commercial non-hazardous waste in Hampton, South…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Environmental Waste Reductions, Inc. v. ReheisDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1995
- Chambers Medical Technologies of South Carolina, Inc. v. BryantCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- Chambers Medical Technologies of South Carolina, Incorporated, and Southland Exchange Joint Venture v. Douglas E. Bryant, as Commissioner of the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control, Chambers Medical Technologies of South Carolina, Incorporated, and Southland Exchange Joint Venture v. Douglas E. Bryant, as Commissioner of the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental ControlCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995