Legal Opinion
Ince v. Rockefeller
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 30, 1968No. 68 Civil 1281PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POLLACK, District Judge.
Defendants, New York State executive and legislative officials, move to dismiss the complaint herein for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and legal insufficiency of the claim. Rules 12(b) (1) and (6), F.R.Civ.P.
This is a class action brought by three qualified voters who reside in East Elmhurst, one of 44 recognized communities in Queens County. (Tauber and Kaplan, The New York City Handbook, 1968). Plaintiffs claim that as to themselves and others similarly situated in East Elmhurst, the present apportionment of State Assembly Districts — made in 1966 under…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Graves v. BarnesDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1972
- Klim v. JonesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1970
- Schneider v. RockefellerNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- United Jewish Organizations of Williamsburgh, Inc. v. Malcolm Wilson, Governor of the State of New York, N.A.A.C.P., Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- McCormick v. First National Bank of MiamiDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1971
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.