Legal Opinion

Governor v. Nevada State Legislature

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 2003No. 41679PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Agosti, C. J.:

The Governor of Nevada has petitioned this court for a writ of mandamus declaring the Legislature to be in violation of the Nevada Constitution, and compelling the Legislature to fulfill its constitutional duty to approve a balanced budget — including an annual tax to defray the state’s estimated expenses for the biennium beginning July 1, 2003, and appropriations to fund public education during that fiscal period — by a time certain. We agree that our intervention is appropriate in this extraordinary circumstance.

The Legislature failed to fund education in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Washakie County School District Number One v. HerschlerWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Lake View School District No. 25 v. HuckabeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  5. Campbell County School District v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Nevadans for Nevada v. BeersNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Alaskans for Efficient Government, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Governor v. Nevada State LegislatureNevada Supreme Court · 2003
  4. SHEA v. STATENevada Supreme Court · 2022
  5. AFEG v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API