Legal Opinion
Home Doc Corp. v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided August 5, 2002PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*278The plaintiff, Home Doc Corp., held a valid mortgage on certain real property in Brooklyn. The plaintiff commenced a foreclosure action on the mortgage in October 1997 in which it named and served the defendant City of New York as one of the defendants. The plaintiff filed a notice of pendency in the office of the Kings County Clerk on October 28, 1997.
On June 23, 1998, while the foreclosure action was pending, the defendant inspected the premises and recommended demolition. In October or November 1998, the defendant demolished the subject premises, without giving the plaintiff any notice of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Calamusa v. Town of BrookhavenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Merino v. City of MiddletownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wantanabe Realty Corp. v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Rapps v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Iavarone v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Jopek v. City of LackawannaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Rapps v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015