Legal Opinion

Town of Colleyville v. State ex rel. City of Hurst

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 6, 1977No. 17781PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MASSEY, Chief Justice.

By quo warranto action the State of Texas, on relation of the City of Hurst, Texas, attacked certain annexation ordinances of the Town of Colleyville.

Following trial several of the ordinances were invalidated and declared void by the judgment. Several other ordinances were declared to be valid.

In respect to the judgment invalidating its ordinances Colleyville appealed. In respect to those which the trial court refused to declare void and which were “validated” the State, Ex Rel. City of Hurst, appealed.

We affirm.

To have all the facts and circumstances perfectly…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. City of Colleyville v. City of HurstCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  2. City of Hurst v. City of ColleyvilleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  3. State Ex Rel. Ratcliff v. City of HurstCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  4. State Ex Rel. City of Colleyville v. City of HurstCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bryan Maxey v. Ed Parsons, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API