Castillo v. American Airlines
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Claimant appeals the Judge of Compensation Claims’ (JCC’s) order on two substantive grounds. Claimant argues the JCC erred in determining the due date for payment of the additional impairment benefits and in adjudicating issues not ripe for determination. We affirm the JCC’s determination that the additional impairment benefits were due on October 13, 2008, as competent substantial evidence supports that finding. We reverse the JCC’s adjudication of any benefit other than Claimant’s entitlement to medical treatment for her knee to include injections and physical therapy.
The parties agreed…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Farnam v. U.S. Sugar Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009