Legal Opinion

Sharif v. Par Tech, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided February 26, 2004No. 01-02-01238-CVPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GEORGE C. HANKS, JR., Justice.

We vacate our judgment of February 5, 2004, withdraw our previous opinion, and issue the following one in its stead.

In this restricted appeal, appellant, Mehboob Sharif a/k/a Bob Sharif d/b/a Burger King (Sharif), challenges the trial court’s judgment in favor of appellee, Par Tech, Inc. In his sole point of error, Sharif contends that the trial court erred in granting a judgment nihil dicit in favor of Par Tech because Par Tech failed to present any evidence in support of Par Tech’s suit on a sworn account and Par Tech failed to have a reporter’s record…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stoner v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Stubbs v. StubbsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Quaestor Investments, Inc. v. State of ChiapasTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Roventini v. Ocular Sciences, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
  5. FRYMIRE ENGINEERING COMPANY INC. v. GranthamTexas Supreme Court · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Britt, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2007
  2. Regenia Bechem v. Reliant Energy Retail Services, LLC and Comerica Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
  3. In Re One Man's Rolex Watch Yellow Gold, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2006
  4. Adib C. Rouhana v. Alberto Ramirez, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2018
  5. McDaniel v. Bennett, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2008

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API