Legal Opinion

Njsc Naftogaz of Ukraine v. Russian Federation

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 17, 2026No. Civil Action No. 2023-1828Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NJSC NAFTOGAZ OF UKRAINE, et al., Petitioners, Civ. A. No. 23-1828 (JDB) v. THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION, Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Nearly a decade ago, several Ukrainian companies (collectively, “NJSC Naftogaz of Ukraine” or “petitioners”) initiated arbitration against the Russian Federation, seeking compensation for Russia’s expropriation of their investments in Crimea. The arbitration tribunal issued the Final Award, awarding petitioners over $4.2 billion in compensation. Russia has subsequently sought to set aside the Final…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Dietz v. BouldinSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. TermoRio S.A. E.S.P. v. Electranta S.P.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
  5. Belize Social Development Ltd. v. Government of BelizeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API