Legal Opinion
Irving W. Rice & Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
Decided January 30, 1967No. P67/25; protests 63/20775 and 64/688 (New York)Published
1Opinion of the CourtBao, C. J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of atomizers similar in all material respects to those the subject of Lanvin Parfums, Inc. v. United States (54 Cust. Ct. 273, C.D. 2543), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lanvin Parfums, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965