Tulsa Industrial Authority v. City of Tulsa

EDMONDSON, J.,

concurring (Joined by WATT, J. and GURICH, J.).

1 I concur with the Court's opinion and write separately to explain the procedural infirmity of appellant's assignments of error. The trial court ruled that the nature of the *1020equitable relief sought by taxpayer required the presence of the bondholders because of 12 0.9$.2011 §$ 2019, and I agree based upon the inadequate appellate record and briefs which fail to show reversible error.

I. Bondholders aé Named Parties

12 Bondholders need not always be named parties in litigation which affects their interests. The U.S. Supreme Court…