Legal Opinion

Wilcox Ex Rel. Estate of Wilcox v. Homestake Mining Co.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 8, 2010No. 08-2282PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKAY, Circuit Judge.

In this action brought under the Price-Anderson Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2210, we must decide whether Plaintiffs alleging they suffered cancer due to exposure to radiation from Defendants’ uranium mill have made a sufficient showing of causation under New Mexico law to survive summary judgment. We first determine the test for causation in this context, then evaluate whether the evidence submitted by Plaintiffs was sufficient to satisfy this test for summary judgment purposes.

This action was originally brought by several plaintiffs who alleged they or the decedents they…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Summers v. TiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Wankier v. Crown Equipment Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  3. Menne v. Celotex Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  4. Heath Ex Rel. Holdyn H. v. La Mariana ApartmentsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Alberts v. SchultzNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McMunn v. Babcock & Wilcox Power Generation Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
  2. United States v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  3. Bobo v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2015
  4. Donlin v. Petco Animal Supplies Stores, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2021
  5. Maldonado v. WL Trucking, IncDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2024

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API