Legal Opinion

Choisser v. Young

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 3, 1897PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Bill, to foreclose a mortgage. Error to the Circuit Court of Saline • County; the Hon. Alonzo K. Vickers, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

Hr. Justice Greer

delivered the opinion of the Court.

From the foregoing statement it appears that the only-defense relied on is, that the amount decreed to be paid by appellant is too much and ought to be reduced by deducting therefrom the premiums paid by him, and legal interest thereon, from the date of each payment up to October 2d, 1894. And it is insisted that “ the manner in which the defendant was allowed to repay such borrowed money was a material and important part of the con sideration for which such premium was bid,” and the demand for the payment of the whole amount of the loan…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Marion Trust Co. v. Trustees of Edwards LodgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Reitz v. HaywardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. Bingham v. Marion Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1901
  4. Dooling v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1900
  5. Hannon v. CobbAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API