Legal Opinion · Dissent

Conrad v. Swan

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 8, 2008Published

1DissentAlexander, J.

[¶ 17] I respectfully dissent. The Court’s action today frustrates legislative policy that both parents participate in decision-making regarding their children, and gives its seal of approval to a pre-trial conference scheduling practice of Family Law Magistrates that has been criticized by this Court’s own Family Division Task Force.

[¶ 18] This case was initiated by Robert Conrad filing a complaint to define parental rights and responsibilities regarding his daughter. 19-A M.R.S. §§ 1651— 1658 (2006). A case management conference was held with the parties on June 29, 2006. Because the Family…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sheepscot Land Corp. v. GregorySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  2. Westbrook v. WallaceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  3. Design Build of Maine v. PaulSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API