Legal Opinion

State v. Goodman

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 10, 1983Published

1Opinion of the Court

92 N.J. 43 (1983)

455 A.2d 475

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

JAMES GOODMAN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued September 14, 1982.

Decided February 10, 1983.

Mark H. Friedman, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the case for appellant (Joseph H. Rodriguez, Public Defender, attorney).

Miriam Kahan Brody, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (George L. Schneider, Essex County Prosecutor, attorney).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by HANDLER, J.

The New Jersey Code of Criminal Justice directs that its procedural provisions shall govern…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Schreiber; Concurrence · Schreiber.

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Illinois v. VitaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Bartkus v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Abbate v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API