Inter-Ocean Casualty Co. v. Ervin
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
BOULDIN, Justice.
The action was to recover the death benefit under a policy of accident and health insurance. On the trial the court gave the affirmative charge, with hypothesis, for plaintiff.
The substantial issue was presented under plea 4, and special replication thereto.
Plea 4, among other things, relies upon a misrepresentation in the application saying: “Neither my hearing nor vision is impaired.” In fact the insured was deaf and dumb. The replication, on which issue was joined, recited:
“Plaintiff says further that if it is stated in said application that the hearing of said applicant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Williamson v. New Orleans InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
- Ala. Gold Life Insurance v. GarnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
- First Nat. Life Ins. Co. of America v. RectorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- National Life Accident Ins. Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- American Cent. Life Ins. v. First Nat. Bank of EnterpriseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- National Life and Accident Insurance Co. v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
- Barnes v. Atlantic & Pacific Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
- Gulf Life Insurance Company v. GreenSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
- UNITED SECURITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. St. ClairAlabama Court of Appeals · 1961
- Jersey Ins. Co. v. RoddamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.