Legal Opinion

State v. Flicker

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 8, 2003No. 990243MI, 996133MI A117427 (Control), A117428PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, P. J.

Defendant and the state have filed a joint motion to remand this case to the trial court for entry of an amended judgment deleting, as a condition of defendant’s probation, a requirement that he complete a sex offender treatment program. We grant the motion.

In the cases underlying this consolidated appeal, defendant was convicted of giving false information to a police officer and failing to perform the duties of a driver. He was placed on probation. The state moved to revoke defendant’s probation when he failed to complete sex offender treatment directed by his probation officer. The trial…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. HiltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  2. State v. McCollisterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  3. State v. BourrieCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API