Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hyde Vending Co. v. Wayne Poultry Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 24, 1972No. 5-5859Published

1DissentConley Byrd, Justice

This action by Hyde vending Co., Inc., against Wayne Poultry Co., is nothing more nor less than an action for specific performance of a contract for service. The Chancellor found as a matter of fact that the Hyde Vending Co., Inc., had an adequate remedy at law. I agree with the Chancellor. Furthermore, I cannot distinguish the specific performance here sought from that which was denied in Paving Improvement Dist. No. 105 of Pine Bluff v. Wright, 181 Ark. 919, 28 S.W. 2d 1062 (1930). In that case we said:

“. . .This is a suit to compel specific performance of the contract employing appellee as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Paving Improvement District No. 105 of Pine Bluff v. WrightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API