Legal Opinion

State v. Clapper

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 2007No. S-06-406PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

After Joe R. Clapper pleaded guilty to third degree assault, the district court overruled Clapper’s demand for a jury trial and ordered him to pay restitution. In Blakely v. Washington,1 the U.S. Supreme Court held that a criminal sentence violates a defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial if it exceeds the “statutory maximum.” The Court defined “statutory maximum” as the maximum sentence a court may impose without any additional findings beyond those supported by the jury’s verdict or the defendant’s admissions. Relying on Blakely, Clapper argues that because Nebraska’s restitution…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Cunningham v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. DraganescuNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  2. PEOPLE v. McKINLEYMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Jones v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
  5. State v. MataNebraska Supreme Court · 2008

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API