In re Smith
Supreme Court of Minnesota
The Capital Bank of St. Paul, a creditor of the insolvents in this matter, filed its petition in the district court for Bamsey county, alleging that Charles W. Kirtland, one of the insolvents, is a non-resident and has never transferred to the receiver herein any of his separate and individual estate; that at the instance and request and by the procurement of the insolvents, and especially of Kirtland, and by money furnished by him, one George S. Lord has purchased and…
Read the full summary
The Capital Bank of St. Paul, a creditor of the insolvents in this matter, filed its petition in the district court for Bamsey county, alleging that Charles W. Kirtland, one of the insolvents, is a non-resident and has never transferred to the receiver herein any of his separate and individual estate; that at the instance and request and by the procurement of the insolvents, and especially of Kirtland, and by money furnished by him, one George S. Lord has purchased and caused to be assigned to himself certain claims and pretended claims against the insolvents, aggregating $82,911, paying…
1Opinion of the CourtBeerv, J.
Certainly the evidence received in this ease is sufficient to sustain the conclusion arrived at by the learned trial judge; so that the only question which requires consideration at our hands is whether the depositions of Lord & Hammond were properly received, These depositions were taken under a stipulation between the parties who appeared on the order issued on the petitioner’s (the Capital Hank’s) motion, and on which the proceedings here involved were had. The stipulation provides that they “may be taken,” at a place named, “to be introduced in evidence, upon the hearing upon said ■order,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hazleton v. Union Bank of ColumbusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
- In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of PennimanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1873
- Adams v. RussellIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
- Hatch v. BrownSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1874
- Jewell v. CenterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Porter v. Grennan Bakeries, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- De Soto Motor Corporation v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
- Cudlip v. New York Evening Journal Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1904
- McLeod v. Miller & LuxNevada Supreme Court · 1917
- Graves v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1930
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.