Legal Opinion

In re Javier M.

New York City Family Court

Decided February 25, 1985Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Claire T. Pearce, J.

Upon the instant motion to reargue by the presentment agency, Assistant Corporation Counsel (hereinafter ACC), the court, after review of the submissions of the parties, finds that no misapprehension of fact or law has been established and continues the order precluding the admission of tangible property in this juvenile delinquency proceeding for reasons more fully stated below.

On January 9, 1985, respondent obtained an order of this court precluding the admission of physical evidence at a trial wherein the respondent is charged with acts which would…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. BriggsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. People v. GoodsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. In re Eric E.New York City Family Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API