Legal Opinion
Gray v. Moore Business Forms, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided May 5, 1989No. C 88-4996 MHPPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PATEL, District Judge.
Defendant Moore improperly removed this diversity action to federal court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a) as amended. The matter is now before the court on plaintiff’s motion to remand. Plaintiff failed, however, to move within thirty days of removal, thereby waiving any procedural defects. The court, having considered the arguments and papers of the parties, denies plaintiffs motion.
BACKGROUND
On December 7, 1987, plaintiff filed a wrongful constructive discharge action in Marin County Superior Court. Named as defendants were the employer, Moore…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jack Fristoe v. Reynolds Metals Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Friel v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Kruso v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Gary Bryant v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Phillips v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Corinthia Louise Wilson v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- Bell v. City of KelloggCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Bell v. City of KelloggCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Merchants Nat. Bank v. Safrabank (California)District Court, D. Kansas · 1991
- Perez v. General Packer, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.