Legal Opinion

Appenzeller v. Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 1, 2018No. 17AP-747PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as Appenzeller v. Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.,

2018-Ohio-1698.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Russell E. Appenzeller, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : v. : No. 17AP-747 (Ct. of Cl. No. 2016-00444) Ohio Department of Rehabilitation : and Correction, (ACCELERATED CALENDAR) : Defendant-Appellee. : D E C I S I O N Rendered on May 1, 2018 On brief: Russell E. Appenzeller, pro se. On brief: Michael DeWine, Attorney General, and Emily Simmons Tapocsi, for appellee. ON APPLICATION FOR RECONSIDERATION DORRIAN, J. {¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Russell E. Appenzeller, has filed a pro se…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matthews v. MatthewsOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. State v. OwensOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Garfield Heights City School District v. State Board of EducationOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Appenzeller v. Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Norman v. Kellie Auto Sales, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
  2. Hal v. Ohio Dept of Edn.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. Hillman v. LarrisonOhio Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API