Koshland v. Weber
Wyoming Supreme Court
Ekror to the District Court, Converse County; Hon. William C. MrnRzrr, Judge. Action by Joseph Koshland and others, doing business under the firm name and style of J. Koshland & Co., against Alex Weber to recover a balance claimed to be due on a wool consignment contract. There was a judgment for defendant and plaintiffs bring error. Other material facts are stated in the opinion.
Read the full summary
Ekror to the District Court, Converse County; Hon. William C. MrnRzrr, Judge. Action by Joseph Koshland and others, doing business under the firm name and style of J. Koshland & Co., against Alex Weber to recover a balance claimed to be due on a wool consignment contract. There was a judgment for defendant and plaintiffs bring error. Other material facts are stated in the opinion. The verdict of the jury was the result of the influence of passion and prejudice against the plaintiffs and was not supported by the evidence. It was undisputed that the factor was restricted to a price by his…
1Opinion
On petition for rehearing.
Scott, Justice.
The opinion in this case was filed in this'court on May 10, 1915 (148 Pac. 369). Within due time the defendant in error filed his petition for a rehearing. In the opinion we correctly quoted the first’, third and fourth interrogatories’, but erroneously quoted the second interrogatory. As the record shows, the interrogatory submitted to the jury is as follows, viz.: “2. What is the amount due under the evidence from the defendant to the plaintiffs as a balance on account of the advances made to the defendant of $24,-000, and the interest thereon at 6%…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Koshland v. WeberWyoming Supreme Court · 1915