Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Gathercole

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 18, 1996No. 94-1798Published

1DissentSnell, Justice

I respectfully dissent.

An unfavorable fact scenario, that stumps the prosecution to explain, sometimes leads to bad law. That has now happened in this case. Our speedy indictment rule allows the prosecution forty-five days to indict an adult after the arrest is made. Iowa R.Crim.P. 27(2)(a). If that time limit is passed, the rule says that “the court must order the prosecution to be dismissed.” Id. The rule allows for a time extension if “good cause to the contrary is shown or the defendant waives his right thereto.” Id. But the prosecution’s problem here is that the defendant did not waive…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  2. State v. SchmittSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  3. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  4. State v. LyrekSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
  5. State v. BoelmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API