State v. Boyd
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Ann McManamon, Chief Justice.
James Boyd appeals his conviction for possession of cocaine (R.C. 2925.11) and possession of criminal tools (R.C. 2923.24). He raises three assignments of error 1 challenging the denial of his motion to suppress the cocaine, the manifest weight of the evidence, and the propriety of the court’s remarks to defense counsel. We find the defendant’s first and third assignments meritorious and remand the cause for a new trial.
Village of Oakwood Police Officer Theodore Rongers told the jury that in October 1986 Randy Miller implicated himself and his purported…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
- State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- United States v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. EleyOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. WoleryOhio Supreme Court · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. McAlpinOhio Supreme Court · 2022
- State v. SpencerOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. Djuric, Unpublished Decision (2-1-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. PerkinsOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- State v. BrooksOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.