Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Barton v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided June 28, 2006No. CA 05-1146Published

1Concurrence

Josephine Linker Hart, Judge,

concurring. 4 conclude that appellant’s constitutional challenge of the juvenile-transfer statute was properly preserved for appellate review. Therefore, I would address the merits of appellant’s argument. I would, however, affirm the circuit court’s decision, and accordingly, I concur in the majority’s affirmance.

In separate motions, appellant moved to transfer the case to juvenile court and moved to declare the juvenile-transfer statute unconstitutional. A hearing was held on both motions, and at the conclusion of the hearing, the court first orally denied…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. HarwoodIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Hamilton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  3. Oliver v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  4. Webb v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  5. Barton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API