Legal Opinion

Davenport v. Holden

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 15, 1920PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On appeal from the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

KatzKNBaoii, J.

This action was instituted for the recovery of damages for the alienation by the defendant of the *198affection of the plaintiff’s wife. In 1913, Oliver M. Davenport, the plaintiff, married Alva Quint, whose parents resided at Collingswood, New Jersey. The defendant, Charles F. Holden, who was married but separated from his wife, became acquainted with Mr. and Mrs. Davenport in March, 1918. In June, 1918, the defendant began to call at the home of Mr. and Mrs. Quint, the parents of Mrs. Davenport, and with whom Mr. and Mrs. Davenport were…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Niosi v. AielloDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. Hays v. Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  3. Hargraves v. BallouSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1926
  4. Rock River Investment Co. v. Mountain Finance Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1934
  5. C.M. v. J.M.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API