Legal Opinion

Holland v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided May 24, 1932No. 4 Div. 913PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRice, J.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of assault and battery, and his imnishment fixed at the assessment of a fine against him of $300. Code 1923, § 3299.

The theory of the state, as we gather, is that the assault and battery were committed upon the person of one John C. Hughes, a deputy sheriff, who was, at the time, undertaking to arrest appellant, without a warrant, for the offense of public drunkenness (Code 1923, § 3883) being committed in the presence of said officer (Code 1923, § 3263).

Appellant strenuously denied that he was drunk, etc., at the time, and denied assaulting, etc., said…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. George D. Witt Shoe Co. v. MillsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. Marsh v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Ex Parte MarshSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tate v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  2. Dockery v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  3. Bridges v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1980
  4. Sims v. StruthersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  5. Hunter v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API