Holland v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtRice, J.
Appellant was convicted of the offense of assault and battery, and his imnishment fixed at the assessment of a fine against him of $300. Code 1923, § 3299.
The theory of the state, as we gather, is that the assault and battery were committed upon the person of one John C. Hughes, a deputy sheriff, who was, at the time, undertaking to arrest appellant, without a warrant, for the offense of public drunkenness (Code 1923, § 3883) being committed in the presence of said officer (Code 1923, § 3263).
Appellant strenuously denied that he was drunk, etc., at the time, and denied assaulting, etc., said…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- George D. Witt Shoe Co. v. MillsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Marsh v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918
- Ex Parte MarshSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
3Cited by7 opinions
- Tate v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
- Dockery v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
- Bridges v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1980
- Sims v. StruthersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
- Hunter v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.