State v. Perkins
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1DissentKatz, J.
The majority concludes that, when a motion for judgment of acquittal is denied at the close of the state’s case, and a defendant subsequently produces evidence in his own behalf, the defendant thereby waives appellate review of that denial. In other words, applying the so-called “waiver rule,” the majority concludes that appellate review encompasses all of the evidence at trial, including the evidence presented by the defendant. Although I agree with the majority’s conclusion that the waiver rule is constitutional, I cannot ignore the serious impact that the application of this rule will have…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Watts v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- State v. ReyesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
- People v. GarciaMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Bernard Austin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- State v. HinesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.