Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Perkins

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided September 28, 2004No. SC 17099Published

1DissentKatz, J.

The majority concludes that, when a motion for judgment of acquittal is denied at the close of the state’s case, and a defendant subsequently produces evidence in his own behalf, the defendant thereby waives appellate review of that denial. In other words, applying the so-called “waiver rule,” the majority concludes that appellate review encompasses all of the evidence at trial, including the evidence presented by the defendant. Although I agree with the majority’s conclusion that the waiver rule is constitutional, I cannot ignore the serious impact that the application of this rule will have…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Watts v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. State v. ReyesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
  3. People v. GarciaMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Bernard Austin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  5. State v. HinesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API